Godiver
Visitor
|
Re:3 Years for spying on kids - 2008/08/28 09:39
I also never mentioned wrongful convictions and it cheapens the debate to suggest i did and use it against me. I have kids and subsequently have many pictures of them in the bath/running around naked in the garden etc that get shown to friends and family without any thought of anything sexual being extracted. I also find it just as ridiculous when the press react to peadophile non-stories with hypocritical vengeance.
However, my point (and i believe the point of Mr Clarke) is that when someone is found with pornographic (featuring the act of sex) material featuring young children, they should get punished and controlled via a register for the rest of their lives.
I know that JK will say that all the posters agree but i would not be so sure, some of the above posters state clearly that they liken child porn to news photos of abuse.
Someone above even asked what the difference is between showing a child war victim for news or a porn image to illustrate a child porn story! It is almost not worthy of a reply, but the difference is at the source, the person took the photo for news purposes or for the enjoyment of weirdos. Black and white.
|
Messageboards 
