IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Westminster's dark secret
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
hedda |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
hedda wrote:
don't recall this bit off gay bashing:
"In the summer of 1982, there was a sensation when it emerged that the Queen’s chief bodyguard was actively homosexual. His prompt resignation did not abate the fury of MPs such as Eldon Griffiths, a much respected backbench Tory, who exclaimed: “It is astonishing that the positive vetting of this officer should either have failed to reveal his homosexual proclivities, or if they were revealed, that it was not regarded as making him a security risk."
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/west...ogether-9593131.html
why is an 'active' gay bodyguard a risk?
I've never been interested in others sex lives but have always though those in power, MPs , PMs, presidents (getting blowjobs in Oval Office)...much better for them to be 'active' and not frustrated.
I bet Margaret & Denis were active. Denis always looked happy 
I suppose before it was acceptable a gay bodyguard might be blackmailed and therefore a security risk?
true Honey but it was legal then and if he was only have legal sex??..shows the thinking of those in charge can be counter productive.
only thing that should concern them...will he take a bullet for Prince Phillip  |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
hedda wrote:
don't recall this bit off gay bashing:
"In the summer of 1982, there was a sensation when it emerged that the Queen’s chief bodyguard was actively homosexual. His prompt resignation did not abate the fury of MPs such as Eldon Griffiths, a much respected backbench Tory, who exclaimed: “It is astonishing that the positive vetting of this officer should either have failed to reveal his homosexual proclivities, or if they were revealed, that it was not regarded as making him a security risk."
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/west...ogether-9593131.html
why is an 'active' gay bodyguard a risk?
I've never been interested in others sex lives but have always though those in power, MPs , PMs, presidents (getting blowjobs in Oval Office)...much better for them to be 'active' and not frustrated.
I bet Margaret & Denis were active. Denis always looked happy
I suppose before it was acceptable a gay bodyguard might be blackmailed and therefore a security risk? |
|
hedda |
don't recall this bit off gay bashing:
"In the summer of 1982, there was a sensation when it emerged that the Queen’s chief bodyguard was actively homosexual. His prompt resignation did not abate the fury of MPs such as Eldon Griffiths, a much respected backbench Tory, who exclaimed: “It is astonishing that the positive vetting of this officer should either have failed to reveal his homosexual proclivities, or if they were revealed, that it was not regarded as making him a security risk."
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/west...ogether-9593131.html
why is an 'active' gay bodyguard a risk?
I've never been interested in others sex lives but have always though those in power, MPs , PMs, presidents (getting blowjobs in Oval Office)...much better for them to be 'active' and not frustrated.
I bet Margaret & Denis were active. Denis always looked happy |
|
|
|
|
