cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: conflict of interest
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
honey!oh sugar sugar. I think you are right about it being destroyed because it was hogwash, but it seems now that the more far fetched something is, the more we believe it.
hedda amazing that the one leading the ridiculous demands for Baroness Butler-Sloss is MP Michael Danczuk who is flogging a book on Cyril Smith.

I think JK is correct- there is a bizarre collapse in democracy. Too many want the claims of a vast (Tory) pedo ring to be proved true despite the fact Dickens was a nutter who thought Satanic Abuse was rampant.

For all we know this 'dossier' was so riddled with fantasy it was destroyed because it would have been shown to be hogwash. They have weaved other homes into Elm Guest House like some vast conspiracy

I think Labour see gains here also- linking Tories to pedos..and from the fevered comments that accompany any article about this, they may be right.

meanwhile I have to contend with a an ex-priest PM who is a crazy as Dickens may have been.