King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]hedda wrote:[/b]
[quote]there is madness in the air.

'survivor groups' are hailing the self removal of Baroness Butler-Sloss with various media lining up to say these groups should have a say, if not dictate how these Inquiries are run.

It doesn't seem to occur to anyone that why in the hell should 'survivors' have any more say than you or me? What in the hell has it to do with them?
In a sense that we , everyone is just as important, or not, as they are.
A bunch of people are demanding special status above everyone else and a chorus line in the media are supporting them.

It's very weird- if they are victims of those who are to be investigated then this is like allowing victims to choose the police or judges.

But it hasn't been established yet if crimes took place.

all critical thinking seems to fly out the window and media mendacity is pumped out.
## I've also noticed in the past week or so that a number of leading journalists- Peter Jukes included who did a great job on th e hacking trials- have been stating the mantra : " [i]there are no witch hunts because witches are imaginary"[/i]
It's not what they are saying (which is rubbish) it's the fact that 4 well connected hacks [i]have said exactly the same words[/i].

It's as though the David Ickes of the world has finally spilled over into mainstream media.

Politicians only have themselves to blame. They have allowed this madness to fester and spread.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: The Fry puzzle
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Anon	Mr Starmer was quoted by the Mail as saying Fry “went off on one”, and said there were already laws in place to deter “faked accusations” of sexual abuse. But they're clearly not working, doh!
hedda	Jim wrote: "Fry â€˜criticises Operation Yewtree in dinner party rantâ€™ calling for tougher laws to deter false sex abuse allegations" www.independent.co.uk/news/people/fry-cr...gations-9602686.html Is this what you're talking about? the meejah decides whether it's a speech or 'rant'. and with one word they can form the debate.
In The Know	Jim wrote: "Fry criticises Operation Yewtree in dinner party rantâ€™ calling for tougher laws to deter false sex abuse allegations" here we go again ............ www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-28314991
JK2006	Yes Jim and check the Mail coverage and the particularly stupid female Telegraph column.
Jim	"Fry ‘criticises Operation Yewtree in dinner party rant’ calling for tougher laws to deter false sex abuse allegations" www.independent.co.uk/news/people/fry-cr...gations-9602686.html Is this what you're talking about?