cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Pistorius case
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
andrew John Marsh wrote:
So are there bullet holes from other times he thought he had an intruder in the protected compound? I didn't follow the case as I had trouble with all the antics. Thus my question.

Seems to me Mr Pistorius knew how to play to the gallery, also if the average man did what he did it be a different sentence.

Mandela was a terrorist, wife beater and hardly made a difference for SA.
John Marsh So are there bullet holes from other times he thought he had an intruder in the protected compound? I didn't follow the case as I had trouble with all the antics. Thus my question.
JK2006 Well I thought the Judge handled it brilliantly and seems to have got it absolutely right. As Pru has mentioned - we can all believe British Justice should learn a lot by watching, listening and reading her conclusions.
JK2006 I suspect he'll be found guilty of culpable homicide. The Judge has been spot on so far with her analysis of the evidence and statements.
JK2006 And talk about a cliff hanger. She's the Simon Cowell of Justice.