King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Kato Harris on the BBC!
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
JK2006	And I repeat the link to the highly respected LAW GAZETTE and the article by the top lawyer about this (spotted, of course, by the mighty Anna Raccoon, still fighting for those hit by Exocets). www.lawgazette.co.uk/practice-points/cro....WQuGSpRilX4.twitter
JK2006	And fascinating that now not only right wing publications like The Times carry letters (as above) - although not yet any huge features about the False Allegations Industry - but even the tabloids like The Sun have woken up to what has been going on (for at least 17 years, in my personal experience, since Max Clifford or MWT spotted the useful loophole in the law Howard had made to enable fame, fortune, promotion and increased budgets for bent cops). www.thesun.co.uk/news/3536763/deputy-hea...to-avoid-sex-claims/
Randall	MWTW wrote: First things first. Take out the compensation then go from that it may pretty much wipe out the false ones apart from the very vindictive. I disagree. The first step should be to reinstate a requirement for corroborative evidence, and probative corroborative evidence too; not just character smearing and irrelevant gossip. Then, motivation of the accuser and anonymity of the defendant is irrelevant. We judge solely on whether the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did what is alleged. If it doesn't, then the public can have confidence in the decision-finding process and the defendant gets a public, official exoneration.
MWTW	First things first. Take out the compensation then go from that it may pretty much wipe out the false ones apart from the very vindictive. I do feel it would go a long way to solving the situation where the likes of Savile case is people being asked to basically get in line with a begging bowl no questions need to be asked.
JK2006	Letter in today's Times