cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Police - when does Conspiracy to Pervert begin?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Likewise, if they provide a criminal with paper on which to forge official letters. Is that just being helpful or is it contributing to a crime?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217352...le-BBC-decision.html
JK2006 Yes JO; good point - when are other "helpful" people involved in conspiracies? Is it when they tip off a TV station that someone's house is about to be raided? Thinking that modern technology won't pinpoint their name and address even when using a proxy (Doh!)? And how about the Crown Prosecution Service? When does incompetence move into conspiracy? OK - perhaps the CPS should have got the police to check Danny Day's background when he made false allegations about David Bryant. But the lack of doing that could be MISFEASANCE in public office and not Malfeasance or Conspiracy. However, when they read statements with clear lies or contradictions in them and STILL authorise prosecution, it moves from passive activity to active involvement.
MWTW Alexander wrote:
I've not posted before but found this thread fascinating. I work for a National paper and we are poised to do a big spread on this. I shall contact you via the Email.
You show us yours will show you ours.
If your in the know you will know how to make contact directly
Jo I have always wondered if this was an officially sanctioned fishing expedition:

twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/274181776283406337?lang=en

That could have told anyone anywhere in the world with Internet access all they needed to know to make a Savile-type sex allegation. The ability to tweet the info "currently" suggests good contacts. Retweeted closer to 900 than 800 times when I first saw it.

It went out first thing on the day of publication of the Leveson report, which said:

"I think that it should be made abundantly clear that save in exceptional and clearly identified circumstances (for example, where there may be an immediate risk to the public), the names or identifying details of those who are arrested or suspected of a crime should not be released to the press nor the public."

(appears twice in Volume II of the report: para 2.3 on p. 791, para 3.3 on page 984)
webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140...c07/0780/0780_ii.asp
Alexander I've not posted before but found this thread fascinating. I work for a National paper and we are poised to do a big spread on this. I shall contact you via the Email.