cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Dunkirk
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 A really interesting article on Dunkirk and what it meant; how the defeat was actually a victory that turned the war.

www.historytoday.com/patrick-wilson/dunkirk-victory-or-defeat
STRATEGY I was hoping to enjoy this film but found it very disappointing. There was no continuity - it was nighttime in a sinking boat then it was daytime in a plane. The only interesting character was ridiculously killed off falling down a flight of stairs. By the time Tom Hardy managed to land his plane everyone was back in Weymouth. The music was Elgar ruined and why was there a sound of a ticking clock all the time?
JK2006 Fabulous - I thought the music and sound effects deserve the Oscar in 2018. But the whole film was very different; put together in a clever and original way which absolutely captured the drama and panic. Rylance is SO good; the best under actor in the world. He expresses more when still and saying nothing than anyone else. Interesting; the old art of acting (theatre) was ham and over the top so people in the back stalls could hear, see and understand. New acting has changed. Films, TV, internet - the key is say nothing, do nothing, convey with the eyes only.