cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Where does good investigation stop and conspiring begin?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Take the Beale case; if police paid for anything when she made her false allegations against innocent men, who were subsequently convicted, would they be held to have assisted in paying for a perversion of the course of justice after the man was acquitted and she was found guilty of perjury? Would that not be an extra element, making the assistance even more serious? On principle, even paying for a taxi or coffee for the woman when she was a "victim" could be now seen as paying for her to commit the crime of perjury.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk