cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Warboys Parole Outrage?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Jo honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
MWT cant seem to get the hang of innocence unless proven guilty, or that not guilty means not guilty, which makes me suspicious of his own non conviction.

Why else would he think that being charged means you did it?


That's a very good point. I don't think we've ever been told why he left the police. You'd think that if you wanted to catch criminals it would be the best place to be. He doesn't seem to miss an opportunity to criticise them either, which makes me wonder if he has an axe to grind.
JK2006 Dear old police; like the media they do love to exaggerate anything that makes them look good and play down anything that might make them look bad. Blackmail changed over the decade, didn't it? These days instead of blackmailing a funeral parlour one would libel a dead DJ. Stick to chewing gum, I say.
Spee And the Metropolitan Police didn't come out too well either.

In 2014, two women were awarded damages (against the police) as their human rights were adjudged to have been violated.

For degrading treatment during interviews conducted as part of the investigation.


Spee Only convicted of one rape?

As well as 19 charges of drugging and sexually assaulting 12 women!


andrew honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Mark Williams Thomas as just been on television saying that the man has committed over a hundred rapes and should never be free.

that may well be the case, but as he was only convicted of one rape we have to assume he is innocent of the rest.

MWT cant seem to get the hang of innocence unless proven guilty, or that not guilty means not guilty, which makes me suspicious of his own non conviction.

Why else would he think that being charged means you did it?


Sounds like Mr Khan is also on the bandwagon, wish the media and authorities were as concerned about Rotherham as they are with this depraved Worboys.