cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: A very good expert on BBC News
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Isn't it interesting how traditional media ignores these difficult questions. Wouldn't the involvement of Isis and other terror groups make far more strategic sense? In my day, the British press would be all over this. Exposure would have brought down the May government, showing how weak, easily fooled and influenced by tabloid thinking she is? Heavens, she'll be calling an election next.
md Two former British Ambassadors to Syria have also expressed their doubts that Assad was behind the chemical attack.

www.rt.com/uk/423817-syria-murray-ford-assad

www.globalresearch.ca/who-is-the-real-cu...ium=related_articles
JK2006 His very believable opinion is a question - why would Assad have done this? Simply nothing to be gained and everything to be lost by using chemical weapons.
JK2006 Lord West - First Sea Lord - Seriously suggests, as ex Chief of Defence Intelligence, that ISIS and other groups responsible for the chemicals in Syria.