King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Using the word
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Randall	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Randall wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I did NOT say that photoing a topless teenager is "abusive behaviour". I said that I class it as abusive. What's the difference? One is fact. One is opinion. As I am sure you are aware. Which is which? And why?
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Randall wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I did NOT say that photoing a topless teenager is "abusive behaviour". I said that I class it as abusive. What's the difference? One is fact. One is opinion. As I am sure you are aware.
Randall	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: I did NOT say that photoing a topless teenager is "abusive behaviour". I said that I class it as abusive. What's the difference?
honey!oh sugar sugar.	holocaust21 wrote: This is bonkers. I havent mentioned locking people up or killing them either. Honey, you said that photoing a topless teenager is "abusive behaviour". If "abusive behaviour" is against a female or a child then in our political climate that is said to be an "evil crime" of "violence against women and girls" and pretty much mandates a "lengthy prison sentence" so I just assumed that's where you were going. If not, then what punishment are you proposing? . I did NOT say that photoing a topless teenager is "abusive behaviour". I said that I class it as abusive. ME. NOT YOU. It is subjective. So I dont care who says it is an "evil crime" of "violence against women and girls" and pretty much mandates a "lengthy prison sentence" because that is one opinion and mine is another. I am not proposing any punishment at all, thank you. I didnt mention punishment, imprisonment, or killing. The thing about free speech Holo, is that it applies to us all.
holocaust21	This is bonkers. I havent mentioned locking people up or killing them either. Honey, you said that photoing a topless teenager is "abusive behaviour". If "abusive behaviour" is against a female or a child then in our political climate that is said to be an "evil crime" of "violence against women and girls" and pretty much mandates a "lengthy prison sentence" so I just assumed that's where you were going. If not, then what punishment are you proposing? Yes, I'm not seeing the equivalence between imprisonment and execution either. However... in the anglophone world the treatment of so-called sex offenders is very much like the civic death concept from the Victorian era. Registration requirements and supplementary court orders creating bespoke criminal offences for individuals, plus lasting difficulties with employment and reputation make life unworkable. It's a kind of internal exile, similar to being sent to the Soviet Gulag except there's no political rehabilitation after a period. The best solution in most cases is to continue life elsewhere. Randall, you pretty much answered your own question in the second paragraph. The reason I compare imprisonment and execution is because they are almost as bad as one another for the reasons you mention. Unfortunately I think you're wrong that one can continue life elsewhere, it was more practical in the past, but as feminism spreads and we exit the EU it's likely to be difficult or impossible. Countries will deny sex offenders permanent residence (or even any entry at all). And even if you get past that you'll then need to learn the language, figure out how to make an income etc. It's very hard in my opinion and for that reason a lot of sex offenders just LDAR (Lie Down And Rot).