cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Police Tricks 23 - Being Ill.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Yes - the other side is still a good story but a LESS good story, trumped (I use that word wisely) by the more extreme, gory, gruesome fantasies. Which is why I think we DO need prosecutions and prison sentences; not being vindictive but it's a better story and will get far more coverage.
MWTW The biggest problem is most of your general public reader of things wants to believe the credible and true story over the incredibly made up lies and then when the person is found to of fabricated the whole story the public cannot take it, no smoke and all that.
Poor old Harvey Proctor is still thought of as a perverted MP, Rolf still has all his convictions intact in their eyes and there is we always knew Cliff Richard was a ...
Now going back to false accusers look at The Nick Trial, he is now in the standard going on about his father abusing him, did he ? Who knows, the boy who cried wolf of credible and true. Just because he has been found out as a Fantasist no more makes it likely that the story of his father is true or not. I doubt many false accusers corrupt cps, coppers and Ex coppers will end up in prison anytime soon.
Randall Achieving prosecutions and convictions shouldn't be the goal, in my view. They'll be reported hardly at all, and dismissed as one rogue bad apple (after another...).

I think publicity should be the aim. Let's take a leaf out of the #metoo book. They weren't getting what they wanted from conventional procedures, so they invented another strategy.

There's a strong public interest in exposing the identities and activities of Mark Pearson's and Liam Allen's false accusers. Likewise with the two men who accused Simon Warr, and officials involved in bringing fraudulent prosecutions - like yours, Rolf Harris's, Dave Lee Travis - to court.
JK2006 Yes Randall I do think, in many cases, deliberate attempts to pervert the course of justice must be prosecuted. Prosecutors and police will always claim "best intentions" - "Credible and True" and other comments. But we are very close to a point where some police (and even their senior bosses - the top cop in my case was made aware of serious breaches by his officers that emerged more fully during the "debacle" - and did nothing) are going to jail. I think the Duckenfield prosecution is unfair and wrong but if he was to blame and deserved to suffer a trial, these recent police deserve justice FAR more.
Randall JK2006 wrote:
I hasten to add that this is a general observation; not aimed at any specific person. I would hate to accuse anyone of so serious an offence.

Don't you sometimes say that police and prosecutors should face individual, personal accountability?

I think naming and shaming, and publicly criticising people involved in these nasty show trials is fair comment.

Officials involved in your latest prosecution, and the outrageous treatment of Liam Allen, Mark Pearson, Alexander Economou and many others should have the whistle blown on their antics.