Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Mark Watts, Exaro and Carl Beech
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Misa |
Barrister Blogger's take on Mark Watts' article can be found here:
barristerblogger.com/2019/08/26/did-carl...h-have-a-fair-trial/
He even features a vile pervert. |
|
Misa |
Elements of Mark Watts' claims in this piece have been addressed by a squence of tweets from BBC News home affairs producer, Daniel De Simone, who was in court of some of the trial. They are set out here, with links to his original tweets: trollexposure.wordpress.com/2019/08/24/d...-v-the-liar-round-1/ |
|
JK2006 |
I gather not and I assume he refused to allow it because he really does not think he'd mad. Whether he thinks he was abused by those people or by other people, I have no idea. Whether he simply wanted to make money and knew the entire fantasy was made up, I have no idea. Madness comes in many forms and thank God his consumed him so much that he made horrendous (for him) mistakes - enabling justice to be done. Which it HASN'T been done in most other cases and is why so many are languishing in jail, innocent of the charges against them. Indeed - that happened to me. And would have happened to Lord Bramall, Harvey Proctor and others, if the police had assisted Barmy Carl as they do most everyone else. In which case those innocent men would also be in jail, Beech would be acclaimed a hero by the media and the public and would be living in compensated luxury. But just because Police, Media (Watts, Exaro etc) and Lawyers for once let the false accuser down (they had no choice - he was SOOO bonkers), justice was done. As it was for me - only because I luckily had a damn good, honest Judge. My False Accusers were as bad as Beech and deserve longer sentences but they won't face Justice as Danny Day hasn't and neither have Cliff's FA's or Gambo's or Jim Davidson's or Jimmy Tarbuck's... because police and media and bent lawyers would then be exposed. |
|
Jo |
Did his defence argue diminished responsibility? If there were grounds for arguing that he was insane, surely they'd have done that. |
|
JK2006 |
I think, if he really thought he'd been abused, inventing a witness would be quite a sensible idea. |
|
|
|
