cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Armchair Investigators
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Bookworm Tell her to get in the queue!
Bookworm Don't be silly.

Nobody ever agrees with me.
😉
wyot Bookworm wrote:
I should have made a point of saying conspiracy types who spout nonsense and bring nothing of value.

Anyyone who is on the same side with us in battle are fine.


So your hypothesis bookworm requires a subjective agreement with your world view? Or were you being ironic?
Bookworm I should have made a point of saying conspiracy types who spout nonsense and bring nothing of value.

Anyyone who is on the same side with us in battle are fine.
honey!oh sugar sugar. The conspiracy sites sometimes make a whole lot more sense than the so called investigator's theories.
I am thinking especially of MWT's ludicrous theory about Madeleine McCann.
I am sure nobody would have blamed Kate if she had smacked him one!