cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: 50,000 in Six Weeks
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Blue Boy JK2006 wrote:
....... need I go on?

No, please don't
Jamie NO! Intensive testing and tracing so that those infected could be quarantined would have meant less deaths. Everyone else could go about as normal.
Green Man How many will die this from the Summer heat ?
JK2006 Who knows? Different countries tried different solutions. The only certain thing is that the four DeathCountries with over 30,000 deaths as opposed to the global average of 1000 believed the media hyped image of the virus. Had they seen the reality they might have suffered fewer losses like Greece (142), Portugal, New Zealand, Denmark, need I go on?
Blue Boy JK2006 wrote:
You mean like South Korea - no lockdown; 252 deaths?

So no lockdown in the UK would have meant less deaths, I dont think so.