King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Rolf in the news again
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
middlemas	wjlmarsh wrote: He would have a chance to appeal for a review of all historic cases to sort out convictions based on unreliable evidence All in Westminster have the opportunity to make such appeals, not only the legally competent and accomplished. Surely the Leader of the Opposition's job is to hold the government to account. Never was there a better time for forensic analysis. Of utter incompetent, basic and inept governance. The Starmer jury is out as his performance this autumn is critical.
wjlmarsh	Keir Starmer was a contributor to Rolf Harris' wrongful convictions and many others. Forgot to note that is what is really known of the former human rights lswyer. I could even be forgiving if he acknowledged his error maybe feeling for the many geniune victims who have been treated badly and ignored mainly in current sexual abuse cases with possible geniune evidence. He would have a chance to use his "Sir" to appeal for a review of all historic cases to sort out convictions based on unreliable evidence and jury/judge/prosecutor emotional appraoch as opposed to factual. If he really wanted justice that is.
wjlmarsh	Keir Starmer -What is known of any key cases of human rights atributed to his success that gave justice and fairness. I have not found anyhing yet. But we do know that he gave weight to "believe the victim" in historical sex abuse cases based on NO tangible evidence. This is an odd position for someone standing on the side of human rights because for any one concerned with human justice would automatically know there are two sides. The compliant could be a victim or a criminal. So why did he not simply do the right thing and advocate "take seriously" and investigate for the truth based on reliable evidence. This is so obvious for a genuine human rights person who is the real McCoy. The evidence of his words so far appears strongly on the side of an opportunist rather than someone who cares deeply. I read/heard some of his speech on ideal society or whatever it was. But like most polictians he attacks and offers platitudes but no actual workable plan of action to solve the problem. Example of what can be acheived when action is taken is the housing of many homeless because of Covid 19. Yes one or two day wonder and not improved upon but nonetheless shows what can be acheived when action and not words is taken. Just a pity governments and oppositions do not learn from small successes and get the idea of action. Solve the problem.
middlemas	www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-...that-he-thinks-he-is
Green Man	Honey wrote: middlemas wrote: Honey wrote: Keir Starmer appears horrible and a bit thick. From a poor family in East Surrey, Starmer was a brilliant student, successful human rights lawyer, accomplished barrister and graduate of Leeds and Oxford universities. As well as being an innovative, fearless and progressive Director of Public Presecutions and Member of Parliament. Perhaps he's the brightest in Westminster. And how does all that stop him being horrible and thick? Mr Hindsight or the Man with 2 Cents; are better titles rather than Sir.