IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Ghislaine Maxwell
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Jo |
From the Daily Mail.
EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Epstein victim bashes 'disgusting' new Netflix documentary, claiming producers forced her to film while she was recovering from cancer treatments and says they took advantage of pedophile's survivors
Caption: "Pictured: Farmer in 1996 just after she was allegedly assaulted by Epstein"
Caption: "She's pictured while working for Epstein. She had her hair cut to match Ghislaine Maxwell's style and color."
Something about this doesn't add up. Looking happy in a photo just after allegedly being assaulted. Looking happy again and with a short haircut to match Ghislaine Maxwell's cut. This suggests that she had admired Maxwell's style, at least. From reports online she first met them in summer 1995 and was assaulted by them in summer 1996. Even if she'd had her hair cut short just after meeting Maxwell, would it really have grown to that length in a year?
It looks as if she may have made false allegations against the chair of the New York Academy of Art.
The New York Academy of Art Commissioned a Report That Purports to Discredit Claims That the School Enabled Jeffrey Epstein’s Abuses
The New York Academy of Art is firing back at Maria Farmer, a graduate who accused the institution of enabling the predations of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a former academy board member who she says sexually assaulted her and her younger sister in the 1990s. ...
Based on the investigation’s findings, the board now says “that critical aspects of Farmer’s allegations against Guggenheim are untrue.” ...
Farmer first met Epstein at her 1995 thesis show at the academy. She told Artnet News that Guggenheim, who was then dean of students, made the introduction to Epstein and his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, and urged her to sell a painting to the couple at a discounted price because “‘they are great benefactors of the academy.'” Guggenheim denies that she ever made this introduction or encouraged Farmer to sell work to Epstein.
The report offers as evidence of Guggenheim’s assertion a statement from an anonymous alum who also sold work to Epstein that night and said that Guggenheim wasn’t involved in the transaction. ...
The report draws on more subtle discrepancies elsewhere, including in Farmer’s recollection of a visit that she, other academy alumnae, and Guggenheim paid to Epstein’s New Mexico ranch back in the summer of 1995.
“Farmer has characterized the visit to Epstein’s ranch as a ‘dinner party,'” the report says. “However, evidence supports that the visit occurred during the daytime.” Meanwhile, Farmer recalls Ghislaine Maxwell wearing tweed that day, but another alum remembered her in black. And while Farmer has characterized the encounter as disturbing, a picture taken that day of the alumnae posing next to a truck and smiling is presented in the report as “photographic evidence” that she “enjoyed the experience.” ...
Another focus of the report is a visit that Farmer made in 1996 to the Ohio estate of Leslie Wexner, the billionaire ex-CEO of Victoria’s Secret, where she says she was assaulted by Epstein and Maxwell. She claims she then called Guggenheim and told her what happened, but that Guggenheim blamed her for the assault and hung up.
Guggenheim denies that Farmer ever called her from Ohio. The report did “not find any information” about whether the call did or did not take place, but noted that Farmer has recounted the alleged conversation to media outlets with varying degrees of specificity (sometimes mentioning her sister too, sometimes not), which it says raises “concerns about either her candor or memory.”
Instead, Guggenheim says that Farmer only mentioned the trip later, once she was back in New York, telling Guggenheim that “the creepiest thing happened” to her with Epstein in Ohio. Guggenheim told the investigators that she “responded by telling Farmer, ‘don’t put yourself in those kinds of situations.'” ...
"Creepy" surely is a tad wan as a description of a sexual assault. Perhaps she embellished what actually happened. |
|
Jo |
Good find, md. |
|
md |
The Mirror was forced to correct another “porn stash” piece in 2016.
www.rolfharrisisinnocent.com/debunking-the-myths.html
www.mirror.co.uk/corrections-clarifications/rolf-harris-8558948 |
|
Jo |
What I didn't mention in the post in the first of those two links was that Lee was paid for her interviews a year before the trial with the TV programme A Current Affair and women's magazine Woman's Day (source). She also gave an interview to A Current Affair after the verdict. |
|
Jo |
wyot wrote:
But why would the Police need to "justify" focusing on Rolf Harris and so "plant" a story post conviction? Has there been some suggestion of malfeance on their part in this case that I am unaware of?
I've no idea whether enabling accusers to streamline their stories would be malfeasance, I suppose that would depend on whether it was deliberate or accidental or involved the police, but I do suspect that this happened in some way. I also think the way in which Rolf Harris's name was released was highly questionable.
www.kingofhits.co.uk/component/option,co...,2/id,192208/#192265
www.kingofhits.co.uk/component/option,co...,2/id,188492/#188517 |
|
|
|
|
