cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Letter from Priti Patel
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Just had a reply to my letter to the Home Secretary - actually from the Police Integrity Department at the Home office. Credit where due; several pages long and detailed. But they do what all the rest of the "system" does - either intentionally or accidentally misunderstanding my points, then answering those wrong questions. So I have replied (more briefly) correcting the mistakes and asking pertinent questions based on the right points.

I was not complaining about the conclusions of my case. Why would I? They were all in my favour. Declared Not Guilty, any future trial banned, complaints upheld.

I was complaining about the total breakdown in public trust of the bosses of the police. Not individual police. Many are fine. Some are excellent (Colin Sutton; last night's Code of a Killer). But the way police are blindly supported and protected by bosses has meant you get deaths by cops like George Floyd in America and Sarah Everard in the UK.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk