IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Climate Change Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Martin
hedda wrote: And we should take a clue from China and India. Both surging ahead with renewable energy (whilst using fossil fuels) and will be way ahead of the rest of the world in 20 years.
In 20 years - without urgent action now - a 1.5° increase in temperature will have occurred.
Most coral reefs will be virtually gone, with flooding and heatwaves happening regularly.
Agriculture will be curtailed and the world's future and economic plight will be in serious jeopardy.
hedda
agree.
And those annoying media tales of powerful people or movie stars flying in private jets as though it's hypocrisy which is nonsense.
The whole idea is to sustain and improve our way of life whilst tackling climate change.
And we should take a clue from China and India. Both surging ahead with renewable energy (whilst using fossil fuels) and will be way ahead of the rest of the world in 20 years.
Wyot
The extremes and virtue signalling are why it won't work. It needs to be de-politicised, somehow. Like criminal justice needs to be. Like Covid should have been. I increasingly suspect that democracy in the age of twitter will be the ruin of us all....
Green Man
JK2006 wrote: What worries me about COP26 and Glasgow is that it reflects the bane of humanity at the moment; SIMPLIFICATION.
Protesters outside scream "Stop all fossil fuels NOW". "Stop all deforestation NOW". Media demands total change by all countries. NOW.
Why? Because they simply cannot understand that this is perfectly possible for some countries and not at all for others.
It strikes me the only sensible country is CHINA. Gradual change. Move from fossil and others to less damaging energy.
Support poorer countries to change too.
One extreme or the other - makes no sense.
The world is changing and humanity needs to adapt. Slowly but surely; mainly looking to the future.
But that's not "a good story". That doesn't fit the agenda.
Why didn't they use Zoom like we had to for work ?`
JK2006
What worries me about COP26 and Glasgow is that it reflects the bane of humanity at the moment; SIMPLIFICATION.
Protesters outside scream "Stop all fossil fuels NOW". "Stop all deforestation NOW". Media demands total change by all countries. NOW.
Why? Because they simply cannot understand that this is perfectly possible for some countries and not at all for others.
It strikes me the only sensible country is CHINA. Gradual change. Move from fossil and others to less damaging energy.
Support poorer countries to change too.
One extreme or the other - makes no sense.
The world is changing and humanity needs to adapt. Slowly but surely; mainly looking to the future.
But that's not "a good story". That doesn't fit the agenda.