IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Fascinating Sunday Morning Live on Rotherham
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Pattaya |
In The Know (as always) wrote:
Pattaya wrote:
....the truth is abuse was ignored,because of fear of racist overtones...I know,I reported a few incidents to police,all ignored,even though a 14yo girl I knew was a regular prossie on Lumb Lane...
TONIGHT - Pakistan's Hidden Shame - C4 - 11pm
90% of street boys have been abused / 1 in 10 murdered
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-27397...ous-paedophiles.html
So true ITK,but better not mention it in case anybody here construes the truth to be racist. |
|
In The Know (as always) |
Pattaya wrote:
....the truth is abuse was ignored,because of fear of racist overtones...I know,I reported a few incidents to police,all ignored,even though a 14yo girl I knew was a regular prossie on Lumb Lane...
TONIGHT - Pakistan's Hidden Shame - C4 - 11pm
90% of street boys have been abused / 1 in 10 murdered
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-27397...ous-paedophiles.html |
|
Pattaya |
JK2006 wrote:
You've expressed exactly my worry Patt; of course there was some abuse just as of course Jimmy Savile pinched bums and tweaked tits. But by inflating and exaggerating - and, worst of all, the bane of civilisation these days, SIMPLIFICATION, we are told (by media) that 1400 children were raped whereas the reality is probably a mixture.
The result? Hysterical over reaction and new laws and spend and emphasis on the wrong areas.
Causing more genuine abuse, not less.
Savile was a single man...a bit 'dodgy' no doubt,but if he broke the law we will never know.
This is not Savile,and as such the anger is not over the exact extend of the obvious abuse,but the fact it was covered up so that immigrant racial groups were not shown up for what many members of their community were up to..I know people in authority in Bradford who deliberately covered things up...shouldn't that be investigated Mr King? |
|
JK2006 |
You've expressed exactly my worry Patt; of course there was some abuse just as of course Jimmy Savile pinched bums and tweaked tits. But by inflating and exaggerating - and, worst of all, the bane of civilisation these days, SIMPLIFICATION, we are told (by media) that 1400 children were raped whereas the reality is probably a mixture.
The result? Hysterical over reaction and new laws and spend and emphasis on the wrong areas.
Causing more genuine abuse, not less. |
|
Pattaya |
hedda wrote:
again- the report does not claim deliberate cover-ups but more a failing in the whole system.
I find the figure '1400' beyond bizarre.
How many were girls- who the report states were obviously a handful- willingly went with these blokes as they deemed that to be a bit more exciting than the life they were leading?. Only to find just another unpleasant situation?
How many out there in those Shameless estates are doing similar?
How many girls "trafficked" were actually just driven to some 'party' in a flat and engaged in a gang bang? Or were semi 'on the game' for a whole variety of reasons?
The fact that the media concentrates on a "doused in petrol" case should worry readers but it doesn't.
what were all "1400' doused in petrol or just one?. Or ten?
Anna Raccoon is correct in her summing up of this matter.
Have you ever lived amongst working class Pakis in a town they dominate Hedda?
I have,and while numbers are inflated,along with facts....the truth is abuse was ignored,because of fear of racist overtones...I know,I reported a few incidents to police,all ignored,even though a 14yo girl I knew was a regular prossie on Lumb Lane...Anna hasn't a clue on this,because peeps like her only see the evidence presented to her,not the reality as it happens. |
|
|
|
|
