cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Little Boy nails system
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda this seems right.."Ashya had been taken “without consent”."
Whose consent? According to the law of the land the parents held all the consent for any medical treatment"

I see a lawsuit pending.
VictimsOfLies Little Ashya King’s case is an important and defining moment in the exposure of the system that is classed as child protection in the United Kingdom.

For many years a handful of journalists and scores of parents have attempted to highlight the inadequacies and, more importantly, the injustices of the child protection regime. What began with the best of intentions – the protection of vulnerable children,- has today turned into a modern day witch hunt against parents.

No longer is the state acting only when it has to, in the most exceptional of circumstances; instead it has created a system that deliberately works on the most extreme of levels: that of removing a child.

www.inquisition21.com/index.php?module=p...page&PAGE_id=360
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk