cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Adam Johnson Appeal verdict
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 I'm sure he anticipated it would be rejected; it almost always is. Judges don't like contradicting each other. That's why I didn't even bother to attend my appeal hearing in 2003. If I had I might have realised that I not only knew the lead judge (there are always 3 for appeals) but had even had sex with him when we were at Cambridge University together in 1964. Judges tend not to mention these things to their fellows. It might cast doubt on their integrity (especially as, in 1964, that sort of behaviour was a crime).

But there is something very wrong with the system. I notice that one of the Judges on the Johnson appeal was Sweeney, the QC at my appeal. What a strange world.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk