cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: the End of The Monarchy
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know andrew wrote:
I wonder if she will be told when to have sex without contraception?

of course !

Its all planned / organised.
In The Know PaulB wrote:
It's been the same story for centuries, and not just in the UK.

quite right ... the Russians, Greeks and French knew how to deal with their Royalty !
andrew In The Know wrote:
tdf wrote:
Speaking as a constitutional Irish nationalist...I wish them well and I think they will be very happy together.

I think we all wish them well (as we would with any newly married couple) ... but the omens do not look good.

Just think what Hollywood fee she will command AFTER the divorce !

... and he is an accident waiting to happen. I said many years ago that he was trouble.
Feel slightly sorry for him ... after all he has been through but he still HAS to play the Royal game !

Their personal happiness is not something ever taken into consideration .... will she breed? will she keep her mouth shut?
These are the questions that matter to them.


Will she cope with more ridiculous, stupid and pointless questions asked by the media?

I wonder if she will be told when to have sex without contraception?
PaulB Anti-Royals love to make a loud noise, but it never changes the fact that the Royals remain very popular.

It's been the same story for centuries, and not just in the UK.

If there was no monarchy, the anti brigade would soon find someone to target.
hedda In The Know wrote:
hedda wrote:
She went to a Hospice at 11pm without the press knowing..I had to go and photograph her with each patient as she sat and chatted to nearly 5 in the morning.

Ooooh ! Look at me ... aren't I good !!?!

Why did she need all the publicity then?
Why not do it in secret?
She was just feeding her own ego.


Obviously Diana was a complex person both playing the press and hating it at the same time.

I spent 3 days with her with 2 other people. She was a friendly and quite down to earth person but every now & then..you had to remember you were with The Most Famous Person on The Planet who has ever been and ever will be.

My best tale was when we were being driven to a Commonwealth Day lunch and we passed St Mary's Cathedral in Sydney where a wedding party was ascending the stairs and she rolled down the window and yelled "don't do it !" as we flashed by.

Did the couple know who yelled at them?

And by a bizarre co-incidence I had known Dodi Fayed very well and once stayed in his Park Lane flat for a month. How she ended up with Dodi- boring, short, sexless (mostly because of his voracious Cocaine habit), spoiled, uninteresting, no conversation,..a complete mystery as to why she even bothered.
Obviously a very complicated Sloane Ranger thrown into a bizarre situation.

My other Meghan Markle complaint : her smile. It's so Hollywood and unlike any other Royal. She's the Royal Family's own Kardashian.

But maybe I'm wrong and it will be a huge success.
I'n not usually though.