IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Christine Keeler
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
robbiex wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
In The Know wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
They do - but once you say "yes" or agree a price, it cannot be rape, can it?
(you have consented - for the money)
I am not sure, ITK. I thought the same as you, but Section 74 defines consent as "if she agrees by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice" .
Some prostitutes dont have the freedom and capacity to make the choice, and the clients know it, so in this case, is it rape?
Bearing in mind that those assisting a rape are also charged with rape..
Well, it is fact a crime to have sex with a prostitute who has been trafficked (even if you didn't know), which seems crazy. If you are going to go down that road, then you could argue that if you give money to a young homeless person, you could be charged with funding drug use, as it is usually the case that that they want the money to fund their next hit (watch druglands on bbc iplayer), or if you get your nails done at the local nail bar, then you are encouraging trafficking (Many are trafficked to work at these places). Apart from those trafficked, there is always another option to prostitution (like getting a job), however they choose prostitution because it is quick and easy money, you can't go blaming the customer.
You cant get a job if you are wanted by the police, or if you want to hide, and if you cant find a job.
I am sure there are plenty who choose it as a career and good luck to them, but the ones I come across are often forced into it by circumstance.
I didnt know about the nail bars, Robbie. I dont think I have ever even been in one, so thank you for recommending Druglands. It looks really good.  |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
In The Know wrote:
Once the punter asks "how much" and in reply he is given a shopping list how can the punter know that it is not being voluntarily offered?
A lot of the issues around consent rely on you being a mind reader or breathalysing your intended partner. |
|
In The Know |
Once the punter asks "how much" and in reply he is given a shopping list how can the punter know that it is not being voluntarily offered? |
|
robbiex |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
In The Know wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
They do - but once you say "yes" or agree a price, it cannot be rape, can it?
(you have consented - for the money)
I am not sure, ITK. I thought the same as you, but Section 74 defines consent as "if she agrees by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice" .
Some prostitutes dont have the freedom and capacity to make the choice, and the clients know it, so in this case, is it rape?
Bearing in mind that those assisting a rape are also charged with rape..
Well, it is fact a crime to have sex with a prostitute who has been trafficked (even if you didn't know), which seems crazy. If you are going to go down that road, then you could argue that if you give money to a young homeless person, you could be charged with funding drug use, as it is usually the case that that they want the money to fund their next hit (watch druglands on bbc iplayer), or if you get your nails done at the local nail bar, then you are encouraging trafficking (Many are trafficked to work at these places). Apart from those trafficked, there is always another option to prostitution (like getting a job), however they choose prostitution because it is quick and easy money, you can't go blaming the customer. |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
In The Know wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Why dont they get the same protection as everyone else?
They do - but once you say "yes" or agree a price, it cannot be rape, can it?
(you have consented - for the money)
I am not sure, ITK. I thought the same as you, but Section 74 defines consent as "if she agrees by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice" .
Some prostitutes dont have the freedom and capacity to make the choice, and the clients know it, so in this case, is it rape?
Bearing in mind that those assisting a rape are also charged with rape..
|
|
|
|
|
