cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: 24,000 attempts to access porn in Parliament
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
andrew Spee wrote:
In the majority of medium to large companies I've worked in, there was a porn ghost built into the software.

So that the Head of IT, or some other senior individual, would immediately be made aware of those logging onto dubious sites.

The Terms and Conditions of your employment (signed by all) prohibited such activities, and the result was summary dismissal.


Although the names of the 'culpits' were never made public.

Just maybe, the star performers only got a yellow card...





It was also a sixth form trick in my school, if too many pupils were hogging the PCs a tutor would come over and ask you to open up a folder.

Then you would open up a nude pic and teacher said 'write your user and password on paper and explain to the head if IT what you did'.

An office that I worked in years ago, their computers had the same ghost software but also they would also put porn on the PC in a hidden file, and easy way to suspend an employee. I was just an office boy then standing by the fax machine sending jargon to an other branch but the boss was a tyrant.
Spee In the majority of medium to large companies I've worked in, there was a porn ghost built into the software.

So that the Head of IT, or some other senior individual, would immediately be made aware of those logging onto dubious sites.

The Terms and Conditions of your employment (signed by all) prohibited such activities, and the result was summary dismissal.


Although the names of the 'culpits' were never made public.

Just maybe, the star performers only got a yellow card...



wyot I suppose so, but do we want the cogs of democracy prioritising a furtive wank every time the smell of roasting coffee beans wafts down the corridor? on the other hand if onanism distracts from legislating that is a result....
PaulB wyot wrote:
I'm more concerned that they have the time. Even if I wanted to at work I wouldn't have the time....We can clearly do with less of them....?

I'm sure that even Politicians have coffee breaks.
wyot I'm more concerned that they have the time. Even if I wanted to at work I wouldn't have the time....We can clearly do with less of them....?