cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Serious question that needs an answer. Help
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda With the current hysteria over the 'All The Money In The World" movie and the fact that Mark Whalberg got paid a fortune and someone else peanuts (both negotiated by their agents) accompanied by the #MeToo campaign and the attacks upon the BBC over so-called "equal pay" etc etc : an answer is needed to an important question about The Yartz:

will it be demanded that a Vincent van Gogh masterpiece be priced equally to an emerging or unknown artist?

If not why not and how do you judge artistic merit (that generally governs price) when it's all subjective in the "I know what I like" sense?

#answers on a postcard with the usual fiver thanks (No more IOUs from ITK either)
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk