cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: The Mail is really onto the False Allegations Industry
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Sadly Hedda Jeremy was forced into Watson as the Fat Toad won the vote for Deputy; Given choice, McDonnell would be Deputy as well as Shadow Chancellor.
hedda Jo wrote:
Is their real concern false allegations or the fact that Tories were accused while the BBC and Labour MPs stoked the flames? Have they done anything to question the Savile allegations since they, or maybe it was the Mail on Sunday, published those articles about Fiona's fake letter and Savile's grand-niece being investigated for fraud and did they question Operation Yewtree? They did an article about "paedophile Rolf Harris" only last month. I'm not convinced and suspect their apparent truth-seeking is politically motivated.

The atrocious Tom Watson MP has seemingly escaped unscathed but perhaps something will emerge in various court cases.

I've pondered why Jeremy Corbyn would want Watson as Deputy Leader as he is Blaritite through and through but I think it's a case of keeping your enemies close.
JK2006 It is of course right that, until the breach is confirmed or proven wrong, an allegation should not derail this woman's career. But her promotion illustrates the official police position - even if found guilty of lying to a Judge under oath, it is not considered a serious breach. Don't Judges (apart from Henriques) reject that opinion?
JK2006 I've always said - their only concern is - "Is it a good story?". Has always been thus. One reason why I had no complaints about my treatment 18 years ago. It was police and CPS I complained about.
Misa I doubt they care one way or the other, Jo. They've been quite happy to play both sides. For every David Rose article there were ten playing up the evily evilness of JS, Rolf or whoever. They seem pretty shrewd about knowing what people want to read, which is after all their business, so we can take some hope from their current focus on false aligations, on that basis...but needn't get too concerned about truth.