cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Epstein; R Kelly; America goes the way of the UK
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda The Epstein thing is odd but this is the era of Witch Hunts so par for the course.

Of course the girls in question are not children and in most of Europe would be legal age.

We can be so puritanical it may be time for everyone to give up sex (I did years ago)or perhaps hurry up and build our sex robots.

But they are cracking down on that as well with importers of "child" robots being busted.
I would have thought, no matter how distasteful you find it..someone having it off with a lump of silicone is far better than a real live child.

My feeling on Epstein: much of the accusations will fall apart (it will take a few years as well)..and there are credible rumblings that Epstein is also a "CIA assett" which is why he got off fairly lightly in the past.
Randall robbiex wrote:
Apparently there is a dvd showing R. Kelly abusing a 14 year old girl which has been given to the jury.

Is she 14 in the video? Did R Kelly know she was 14?

To answer yes to both questions, beyond a reasonable doubt, we'd need more evidence than someone simply asserting that's it's so.

Otherwise why bother with a trial?
honey!oh sugar sugar. JK2006 wrote:
We'll have this discussion until one or both meets our maker Robbie but I repeat; the presumption of innocence means ALL allegations must be considered false until, unless (and possibly even after) they are declared true in a court of law.

I think you can assume innocence all round until proven otherwise.

We dont want to assume people are rapists, but no need to call accusers liars either.
JK2006 We'll have this discussion until one or both meets our maker Robbie but I repeat; the presumption of innocence means ALL allegations must be considered false until, unless (and possibly even after) they are declared true in a court of law.
robbiex We don't know whether the allegations are false. Apparently there is a dvd showing R. Kelly abusing a 14 year old girl which has been given to the jury. False allegations do exist, Gambo, Cliff, Saville (some of it at least), Tarbuck, but Kelly's allegations are more recent, with dvd evidence. He's going to need very good lawyers to get out of this one.