King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: The IICSA
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
'M'	Spot on JK. They won't want to listen as they may loose their jobs for complete incompetence.
Randall	Juxtaposing the lack of scrutiny of Peter Saunders and the lack of scrutiny of participants in IICSA is a particularly strong point. Should be reiterated widely, I think.
Jo	Well said, JK. I hope they take on board what you say. If the IICSA is dealing with people who are conning them, it's probably easier to remain in denial than admit to being conned, as to do so would mean admitting to being fools.
hedda	"Your excuse to me about Saunders’ behaviour was that it was in 2008, long before the IICSA was set up. " unbelievable response when the whole inquiry is about "historic" abuse. When will it dawn on these people the absolute insidious behavior of Saunders and his cover-up (along with NAPAC'S) will eat away at the fabric of IICSA?.
JK2006	No; just suspect. As the mighty Andrew Sachs said to Basil Fawlty; I know nothing.