cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Harry and Meghan
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
md It's good finding examples on social media showing where mainstream media journalists think they can easily get away with their deceptions.

twitter.com/HollyLynch5/status/1190015316023115776

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-76346...-MP-Holly-Lynch.html
honey!oh sugar sugar. Barney wrote:
H&M have 'single-handedly modernised the monarchy'....says CNN





Its a typo. they meant "mortified"
Barney H&M have 'single-handedly modernised the monarchy'....says CNN



honey!oh sugar sugar. Jo wrote:
Prince William 'worried' about Harry after ITV interview

I can't see what Meghan and Harry have done wrong other than being put on a pedestal then torn down by the media. I hope they win their court cases.


They jumped off the pedestal.

I am sorry they are having difficulties, but I dont need to know the ins and outs of their, and the rest of their family's business.

I thought it was a bit odd that the Duke was complaining about the press, while providing them with gossip and speculation about his own brother.

If they dont like the attention, they can just go off somewhere and do whatever they want, be whoever they want to be, like anybody else.
But they are giving the impression of revelling in it.
There is a lot to be said for a stiff upper lip.
Barney Then, should the taxpayers be allowed to comment on the royals? After all - we fund a lot of their activities and properties.

Public funds even bought Sandringham and Balmoral - although amazingly, the Queen gets a tax benefit for allowing their use, for non-royal purposes!

Frogmore Cottage's renovations cost the UK taxpayer £2.5 million alone - and we're not permitted to go near the place.