cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: At least some of my response is included by the BBC
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Jo I suppose they at least reflected your side of the story to some extent.
Bookworm I lost it at the part where it said they didn't have enough detectives who were trained in that role ( or something similar).

I was wondering how many in the entire force were fit to be dealing with abuse cases!

And indeed all forces/cases!

I sound like a broken record, but I'll keep turning up the volume .

Crank it up and rip the knob off!
honey!oh sugar sugar.

"Surrey Police's Deputy Chief Constable, Nev Kemp, said: "We are sorry for the impact this has had on victims and those involved in the case."


I have a feeling that by "Victim" he doesn't mean you, Mr King?
JK2006 www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-50518077
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk