cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Madeleine McCann
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Jo hedda, I would welcome your views on this.

An Australian journalist called Mark Saunokonoko has a podcast series on the Madeleine McCann case. I dipped into one of them and he was going on about paedophiles in the UK, referring to the accusations against Sir Clement Freud as if they were reliable and saying that the McCanns were connected to a firm owned by some relative of his, as if this was suspicious. So my impression was that he was entertaining and/or spreading false allegations/conspiracy theories. He seems to have been in touch with Goncalo Amaral, the Portuguese policeman in charge of the original investigation but subsequently sacked, and it looks as if he may sympathise with his view, i.e. that the parents were responsible.

From his Twitter page:

"A LOT of Madeleine McCann noise right now. But where's the evidence against Christian B linking him to Maddie's disappearance?"

"Here's how Goncalo Amaral accurately foreshadowed today's developments more than one year ago, describing a German 'scapegoat'…"

"Quite incredible how Jim Gamble went from suspecting Gerry McCann to inviting him to speak at a CEOP conference 26 Jan 2010…"


He's apparently a senior journalist at Nine News.
Jo Green Man wrote:
Any one can have a theory about this case without evidence. It was either a joke or passing comment in the pub. We will have to see.
Honey wrote:
I am extremely uncomfortable about this suspect's name being published everywhere, and the appeal for information from everyone that ever saw him.

This is no different to creating false accusations by appeals and compensation. It stinks!

I have also been thinking that the pub comment may have been a "joke" and there might be a risk of false allegations, especially when a reward is available.

"The joint appeal from the British, German and Portuguese police includes a £20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of the person responsible for Madeleine's disappearance."
www.bbc.com/news/uk-52916137
Honey Jo wrote:
It's MWT, I'm afraid, on This Morning, but he's quite informative. Also pointing out that he had put forward the theory of a stranger abduction from the start, though I'd have thought most people (apart from the anti-McCanns) would have concluded that.




The McCanns knew that she couldn't have got out of the room herself, and her toy had been placed on a shelf way out of her reach.

He either couldn't be bothered to read the basic facts, or he was saying that they were lying.

I am extremely uncomfortable about this suspect's name being published everywhere, and the appeal for information from everyone that ever saw him.

This is no different to creating false accusations by appeals and compensation. It stinks!
Green Man Any one can have a theory about this case without evidence. It was either a joke or passing comment in the pub. We will have to see.
Sheba I love the pirate patch over his eye.