King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: You will be believed
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Jo	JK2006 wrote: Likewise - now - Ghislaine Maxwell if she filed (as she must do) a counter claim against the Giuffre woman. Police must then "believe" and investigate Giuffre's motives and past behaviour. Simultaneously. I understand that the three accusers on the basis of whose allegations she's now charged don't include Giuffre and that she settled with Giuffre when Giuffre sued her for defamation in a 2016 civil case. But it looks as if Giuffre is suing for defamation her again, which I don't understand. 11 August 2020: Ghislaine Maxwell’s claim of ‘critical new information’ just a stall tactic, accuser says Ghislaine Maxwell’s claim that “critical new information” could impact her criminal and civil court cases is simply a stall tactic that should not delay the unsealing of secret court documents, one of her alleged victims argued in a letter filed Tuesday. Virginia Giuffre, who is suing the alleged madam for defamation in Manhattan federal court, said Maxwell’s claim “illustrates her disregard for the Court’s time, as well as her willingness to engage in dilatory conduct to thwart the unsealing process,” according to the court papers.
Honey	I think you can only accuse someone of perverting the course of justice if you use a private prosecution? Maybe someone can explain it further?
JK2006	Take the case of David Bryant the fireman. If he had immediately filed a counter complaint against Danny Day, accusing him of attempting to pervert the course of justice and extortion, police would have had to investigate Day at the same time as they investigated Bryant and would have discovered his nefarious past. Likewise - now - Ghislaine Maxwell if she filed (as she must do) a counter claim against the Giuffre woman. Police must then "believe" and investigate Giuffre's motives and past behaviour. Simultaneously.
JK2006	I thought I'd put up this link; I didn't; so here it is (brain going; senility looming; help). trollexposure.wordpress.com/2020/08/06/c...e-of-prats-policing/
JK2006	Over 13,000 views to this thread in 10 hours; almost as many as to the Ghislaine Maxwell thread in weeks.