You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
(+) / (-)

B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Absurd
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Honey Surely it is easily possible to establish if a snapchat site has been hacked or not, or that a photo has been sent or not?
Jo If she sent the boy topless photos of herself and an explicit video she seems lucky to have escaped the sex conviction. It doesn't seem clear to me that he made it up.
JK2006 Why a retrial in January? Clearly the boy was a false accuser making up claims.