IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Mark Williams Thomas
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
'M' |
Go view "to catch a Paedophile" on youtube you will find that most if not all the persons shown in that series would all come back to an MWT involvement.
Lets say a hell of a lot of groundwork had been done for the Mets "paedophile unit" ( no such thing exisTed)
MWT prior to this had shown himself on TV portrayed as young girls touting for fish to come for the bait or 'Jail Bait' as everyone refers to it back in the 70s 80s.
It would be interesting to know how much background evidence MWT brought to the table to convince the child protection unit to go with a TV doc, mind you it made great telly as all cop progs do and a direct copy of ear lier American TV entrapment shows (no entrapment laws in UK though) so an easy set up to make would you not say.
I think you will find MWTs preferred place was MSN pretty 2012
Ask Suzze, Suzzy, Susan, lil Sue, Hels, hells, missy helen the list could continue. |
|
JK2006 |
I don't think MWT is the kind of person who does anything "officially". And I suspect police find very useful people who are prepared to leak, "tip off" and similar, under the woodwork. Off the books. Let's imagine a major celebrity is falsely accused of something. Police quickly spot it's false but need publicity to get more credible false accusers to come out of the woodwork so they can investigate, prosecute and get brownie points, promotion, increased budgets. But they cannot be seen or proven to be attempting to pervert the course of justice. That's when they need the likes of MWT. |
|
pip2456 |
hedda wrote:
I'm probably an idiot but I "updated" MTW's Wiki page years ago to include his arrest from blackmail (and acquittal) and he was furious.
I even got Jimmy Wales  on Twitter to agree that his past history was relevant.
But I decided not to keep torturing him.. 
He wasn't a specialist in much..a PC for most of his time except the last 18 months as an acting DC in victim liaison.
## Read his Brazil tale where he says in 2012 - updated twice so no mistake-:
"As a former detective and with nearly 30 years of experience in investigating child abuse,"
30 years? He was born in 1970 which means he started "investigating child abuse when he was TWELVE YEARS OLD !!!
And if he specialized in investigating child abuse for 30 frigging years how come he never investigated Jimmy Savile until years after he was dead?.
The man is loose with the truth which doesn't bode well for any investigation he might have been involved..which would be probably be none!
www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/child-p...cash-in-fans-3660354[/quote]
He is loose with the truth and I am sure that the Police know that even if they will not say so publicly.
However it would affect their decision as to whether or not to use his experience and expertise in any cases that they were investigating.
It would be very interesting to make a Freedom of Information request to the Crown Prosecution Service to ask whether they had ever used the services of Mark Williams-Thomas as either a normal Prosecution Witness or as a Professional Witness or as an Expert Witness in any of their cases since he left Sussex Police and if so, how many cases and in which years.
They would have a record of this information as they would have had to pay any fees due to him and I doubt whether they could refuse to answer such a simple request. |
|
hedda |
pip2456 wrote:
pip2456 wrote:
Simpson wrote:
pip2456 wrote:
Mark Williams-Thomas's Wikipedia page says "During his time with Surrey Police he was a specialist in major crime and child abuse"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Williams-Thomas
If he did specialise in major crime he would have been involved in investigating serious, dangerous and violent criminals.
So why has he then chosen to seek so much publicity and, with his unusual name and home address easily found with a simple Google search, why would he put himself and his family at considerable risk of retaliation from those criminals.
That does not make any sense either.
You quote Wikipedia as fact. People can write anything they want on it!
It's for naive idiots and has zero factual scrutiny or editorial analysis!!
Most contributors are idiots and/or conspiracy artists, or freaks.
Why are you so cross?
He has said it in lots of other places too
Hi Simpson,
Do you have evidence that Mark Williams-Thomas's Wikipedia page has been written by "idiots and/or conspiracy artists, or freaks."
If so please post it here as I am sure everyone here, including Mark William-Thomas, would want to know who was posting untrue information and get it corrected.
Many Thanks
I'm probably an idiot but I "updated" MTW's Wiki page years ago to include his arrest from blackmail (and acquittal) and he was furious.
I even got Jimmy Wales on Twitter to agree that his past history was relevant.
But I decided not to keep torturing him..
He wasn't a specialist in much..a PC for most of his time except the last 18 months as an acting DC in victim liaison.
## Read his Brazil tale where he says in 2012 - updated twice so no mistake-:
"As a former detective and with nearly 30 years of experience in investigating child abuse,"
30 years? He was born in 1970 which means he started "investigating child abuse when he was TWELVE YEARS OLD !!!
And if he specialized in investigating child abuse for 30 frigging years how come he never investigated Jimmy Savile until years after he was dead?.
The man is loose with the truth which doesn't bode well for any investigation he might have been involved..which would be probably be none!
www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/child-p...cash-in-fans-3660354 |
|
hedda |
Sheba wrote:
So why did that Yorkshire Post article of 19th March 2002 (which Jo mentioned earlier) about Gumfighters disappear? Did they just have a clear-out of older articles or did someone request that it be removed?
Anyway, I knew I had a copy of it somewhere and have now located it.
The national chewing gum removal specialists, GumFighters, has been hired by Sheffield Council city centre management team to clean-up the main retail areas.
GumFighters director Mark Williams-Thomas said: “We are pleased to be working to create a cleaner and healthier environment for everybody in Sheffield. However, it is very important that people realise the damage caused by discarded gum and dispose of it correctly.”
He added the best way to dispose of chewing gum was to return the used piece back to its wrapper, secure it within scrap paper or, if you insist, swallow it.
“Don’t worry, it won’t collect in your intestines. It will just pass through your system in one piece, because gum base can’t be digested.,” added Mr Williams-Thomas.
you could just do as the luscious Sharon Stone did..looking sensational on this year's Cannes Film Festival red carpet, take it out of your mouth and hand it to her companion who quickly continued munching on it  .
Very Hollywood. |
|
|
|
|
