cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Rwanda
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Indeed Honey and if one of those being "deported" happens to be gay and someone in Rwanda doesn't like gay people and decides to kill them, I suppose the Courts and Judges of our wonderful country will declare their corpse should be flown back to the UK for burial - if the July legal decision goes their way.

DOH! "Great" Britain?
Honey JK2006 wrote:
We should all be grateful that Priti and Boris don't send immigrants to gas chambers. Oops - that could be the next suggestion to stop these evil people smugglers.

Nobody knew about the gas chambers until it was too late. It all seemed reasonable at the beginning.
Honey Wyot wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
But Charles did NOT speak out publicly - being well aware of the convention. I disagree that he must remain politically neutral though. As long as our elected leaders are criminals they should be exposed.

Yes to be fair to Charles I did not look into how/where he may have said this. I agree with everything you say about Rwanda I am disgusted by the policy. If our elected leaders are acting unlawfully I agree with you that he can and should comment. But for the sake of the Royal Family (as a viable institution) I think they very much need to remain neutral on political matters otherwise. I could go on about why but we all understand why...


I agree and would extend this to Charles and William bleating about the environment, because it is usually political.
JK2006 LATEST - Judge says flight CAN take off with 11 people (wasn't it originally over 150?) but all of them can be brought back if July's hearing decides against stupid Patel and stupid Johnson. But this makes NO SENSE!! Why send these 11 now? Why not at least postpone until after the July decision?
JK2006 We should all be grateful that Priti and Boris don't send immigrants to gas chambers. Oops - that could be the next suggestion to stop these evil people smugglers.