cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: latest Andrew claptrap
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda interesting that the vast majority of comments on the Mail's ghastly new "oh woe is me" Epstein claimant are basically "enough already..zip it"

One points out something interesting..the claimant's endless tales of alleged abuse by all manner of famous / rich people contain no names..why? As one points out.."no photos"?

Why has this person never named another person (apart from Dersowitch who is suing her) when no-one could be more powerful than Andrew?

I still say it's all going to end in tears.