cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: It really is frightening, is it not?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Declan Marlborough Wyot wrote:
no appetite to ever consider that someone may have been found guilty who is innocent.

Absolutely correct. There's thousands of innocent people in prison, as JK has been saying for years.

Independent adjudicators (Judges) are essential to the legal process, but post-judgement analysis must be mandatory.

Most certainly in serious and major cases. And particularly when the jury is split.
Wyot These days the outraged majority are free to consider someone guilty who has been found innocent, but has no appetite to ever consider that someone may have been found guilty who is innocent. In other words, people are addicted to condemnation.
JK2006 When almost every area of the media bows to the "good story" angle?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1108626...epps-legal-team.html