I thought this enormous double page spread in the Mail warranted far more attention than it got (because, of course, it damaged a "good story") but it won't go away; neither will Anna Raccoon's incisive and forensic examination of the NHS reports into Savile's "activities".
How long, I wonder, before the Mail - remember, not only the nastiest but the best paper in Britain, and a great story trumps everything - decides to expose the entire Savile fiasco for what it was?
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217352...le-BBC-decision.html