Leaked photos of Olympic gymnast McKayla Maroney are CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

Yep17 year old photos are child abuse images, should now she not be arrested for uploading these discusting images and be JAILED !!!!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2741448...gymnast-Mckayla.html

This is mental when is a 17 year old a child ?

Also gymnasts always got their legs open.

So everyone who has clicked them now has child porn on their computer?

In the eyes of the UK law, yes.

Andrew. a child is under the age of 18.
Level one: Images of erotic posing, with no sexual activity;
Level two: Non-penetrative sexual activities between children, or solo masturbation by a child.
Level three: Non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children.
;Level four: Penetrative sexual activity involving a child or children, or both children and adults;
Level five: Sadism/Torture or involving the penetration of, or by, an animal.

The age of the child is now an aggravating factor and police officers should be encouraged to ensure that images are divided not only according to the categories set out above, but also as to whether the child is under 13 years, or 13 - 15 years and 16 - 17 years old.

So you can legally have sex with a child of 16/17 but not look at any photos?

MWTWATCHER wrote:
In the eyes of the UK law, yes.


That might come in handy then!

JK, as mad ss it seems, yes

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
MWTWATCHER wrote:
In the eyes of the UK law, yes.


That might come in handy then!

Cougar alert.

And of course don't forget you can technically be done for Child porn phots if in pocession of an old copy of the Sun!
Sam Fox and others were only 15 when they had nude test shots done...and some had photos published there at 16!