Silliband will increase spending on the NHS (spending on the NHA has always increased year on year !)

He promises YOU £8 an hour minimum wage BEFORE the election -
and will say how YOU will pay for it AFTER the election !

Note - He is keeping ALL the spending cuts (all the ones they opposed !)

He promises to balance the books ....

like they didn't last time ....
... or the time before that ....
... or the time before that (Devalue the Pound ! Everyone 20% worse off instantly) ....
... or the time before that (send for the IMF to bail us out !)

How can intelligent people fall for this tosh ?

In The Know wrote:
Silliband will increase spending on the NHS (spending on the NHA has always increased year on year !)

He promises YOU £8 an hour minimum wage BEFORE the election -
and will say how YOU will pay for it AFTER the election !

Note - He is keeping ALL the spending cuts (all the ones they opposed !)

He promises to balance the books ....

like they didn't last time ....
... or the time before that ....
... or the time before that (Devalue the Pound ! Everyone 20% worse off instantly) ....
... or the time before that (send for the IMF to bail us out !)

How can intelligent people fall for this tosh ?

Increse the min wage to £8 an hour then tax it by £2.20.

He can say whatever he likes, because Labour haven't a hope in hell while he is in charge.

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
He can say whatever he likes, because Labour haven't a hope in hell while he is in charge.

I see Labour winning about 5 seats and it be up North.

ITK agree the the name Sillibamd. And unfortunatelly UK like many countries no alternative suppose like a one party state in practice, if not in name.

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
He can say whatever he likes, because Labour haven't a hope in hell while he is in charge.

This made me smile -

"In the early days there were no rules on who could vote. But a feeling developed that too many "persons of low estate" were doing so. So from 1430 you could only vote if you owned property worth 40 shillings. The rule stayed in place for 400 years".

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29252332

minimum wage in oz over £9.

Britain can afford it. Just chase those tax avoiding corporations who profit there and shift if off broad in phoney schemes. News Corp would be a start.
Odd how so many Brits don't give a stuff about being ripped off as long as it's a billion pound entity but show 'em a Red Dee and they start frothing at the mouth.

comrade hedda wrote:
Odd how so many Brits don't give a stuff about being ripped off as long as it's a billion pound entity but show 'em a Red Dee and they start frothing at the mouth.

It's actually WHITE DEE, and they probably cost us far more than the corporations when ALL their handouts are taken into account.

At least we get something back from the corporations (and they actually employ a few people !)

In The Know wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
Odd how so many Brits don't give a stuff about being ripped off as long as it's a billion pound entity but show 'em a Red Dee and they start frothing at the mouth.

It's actually WHITE DEE, and they probably cost us far more than the corporations when ALL their handouts are taken into account.

At least we get something back from the corporations (and they actually employ a few people !)


If she has watched her Big Brother performance back she is definitely Red Dee now. ! In fact, she probably has a paper bag on her head.

In The Know wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
Odd how so many Brits don't give a stuff about being ripped off as long as it's a billion pound entity but show 'em a Red Dee and they start frothing at the mouth.

It's actually WHITE DEE, and they probably cost us far more than the corporations when ALL their handouts are taken into account.

At least we get something back from the corporations (and they actually employ a few people !)

No mention of MP expenses, if the min wage put up to £8 it would encourage people to get jobs.

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
He can say whatever he likes, because Labour haven't a hope in hell while he is in charge.

Ten year plan ?

The thought of Labour in control for ten minutes gives me the shudders (just look at what happened when they had three terms !)

NOT ONE WORD about the economy or the deficit in his speech .... probably a wise thing !!!

In The Know wrote:
comrade hedda wrote:
Odd how so many Brits don't give a stuff about being ripped off as long as it's a billion pound entity but show 'em a Red Dee and they start frothing at the mouth.

It's actually WHITE DEE, and they probably cost us far more than the corporations when ALL their handouts are taken into account.

At least we get something back from the corporations (and they actually employ a few people !)

ITK proves my points thank you very much .

Amazing.. he is thankful for the pittance from tax dodgers & makes the bizarre claim about White Dee costs more than say, as just one example : Vodafone who have bilked the taxpayer of £6B to date and actually thinks he has a right to condone it. ( not that Noo Labour will correct this theft..same same as Tories)

## I was referring to White Dee's cousin Red Dee who lives nearby in 2 council flats and has 14 children from 18 different fathers and takes state sponsored holidays in Torremolinos in a luxury villa.

###as Hedda the Oracle predicted on here years ago, the Tories under former PR man Cameron will do nothing about the social security bill (after all-they created it) and just tinker at the edges.

Meanwhile Rupert Murdoch pays himself around £30m a year in wages, costs the taxpayer up to £40M in prosecuting his corrupt empire which rolls on unscathed and laughing all the way to it's Seychelles bank.

#### You either want everyone to pay their fair share or you are just a blatant hypocrite and the moronic claim that tax avoiding corps (it's in the £100Bs a year - think about what that could pay for)somehow give something back defies the first Rule of Capitalism :where there is a vaccuum it will be filled no matter how high or low their profits.

Nor do "we get something back from the corporations"-we subsidise them including their employees.

Google another example- rigging the books, employing minimal staff whilst rapidly destroying the publishing & advertising business and creating 10,000s of unemployed & based in cyberspace and almost beyond the reach of law.

## as Hedda The Great also pointed out : after 9/11 the USA / UK cracked down on Tax Havens in respect of legal entities set up to finance terrorist organisations and succeeded simply by threatening them including small Tax Haven states like the Caymans. It can be done.

In The Know (as always) wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
He can say whatever he likes, because Labour haven't a hope in hell while he is in charge.

Ten year plan ?

The thought of Labour in control for ten minutes gives me the shudders (just look at what happened when they had three terms !)

NOT ONE WORD about the economy or the deficit in his speech .... probably a wise thing !!!


He doesn't even try to look as if he believes it himself.

Worst performing Labour leader since Foot!

Labour is nothing when not connected to the working Class,and Milliband will not win elections appealing to black lesbian social workers alone.

Pattaya wrote:
Milliband will not win elections appealing to black lesbian social workers alone.


...... and there aren't too many of those in Doncaster !

honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
He doesn't even try to look as if he believes it himself.

Silliband "insists" deficit is priority -

Ed Miliband has admitted missing out a passage on the UK's financial deficit in his Labour Party conference speech.

In a round of media interviews he said "one of the perils" of delivering a speech without a script was "not remembering every detail".
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29335450

........ details such as who will be paying the bills LOL !

In The Know wrote:
Pattaya wrote:
Milliband will not win elections appealing to black lesbian social workers alone.


...... and there aren't too many of those in Doncaster !

Are you sure?...Did you look behind him?

Gordon Brown may well come back after they loose the next election....a man reborn?

In The Know (as always) wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
He doesn't even try to look as if he believes it himself.

Silliband "insists" deficit is priority -

Ed Miliband has admitted missing out a passage on the UK's financial deficit in his Labour Party conference speech.

In a round of media interviews he said "one of the perils" of delivering a speech without a script was "not remembering every detail".
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29335450

........ details such as who will be paying the bills LOL !

Tobacco tax?...more companies moving abroad?

Milliband knows the winds of change are blowing and he's had his chance.

For 2015 we'll see Boris being primed to take over the Tory 'Head Clown' post pitting him against Nigel Farage, and Blair & Mandelson will then perform their 'final act of destruction' by installing Joey Essex as Labour Leader, and thus future PM - all the Under 30's will suddenly want to vote.

Tories take a MASSIVE lead over Labour in the polls

Voters who think the Conservatives have the best economic policies have risen from 35 per cent to 45 per cent over the last six months, according to pollsters Ipsos MORI.

The figure compared with just 20 per cent who back Labour on the issue, down from 22 per cent.

The gaping 25-point lead on policies seen as central to who will win the general election next May.
www.express.co.uk/news/uk/160754/Tories-...abour-on-the-economy

Everyone can see that the Tories are managing the books very well (under the circumstances). Even the scroungers know its true (they just don't want to believe it !)