Yep, MWT today celebrates the two year anniversary of his exposure of Jimmy Savile.
Ok, so what is there to celebrate ? producing a show about a dead man who cannot defend himself for what, finacial gain and to become part celeb himself.

I could not stand JS and I am sure he may be guilty of some of the allegations aimed at him but sure is eggs is eggs many jumped on this train ride on a free ticket.
If you wish to tell the story do it for the truth and prove the truth, murder, fiddling dead bodies may be a bit far fetched, a rummage around a teenage girl was par for the course in the 70's for many men and i am sure today too only today it is not acceptable.

mobile.twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/517935555989233665

the big up to merion etc is for cash upfront for the new Exposures coming soon on a TV near you.

what a goose !

(geedit?)

MWTWATCHER wrote:
I could not stand JS and I am sure he may be guilty of some of the allegations aimed at him

I haven't come across any that convinced me to the point where there's no need for a trial...

Having a Gander ?

Has Liz got Big Eamonn's balls in her hands too?

Obscene in every sense of the word, and getting more and more so

Is that no sexual assault Eamoon is carrying out infront of an eagle eyed presenter of Expos'e, wait until you die Mr Holmes, ill be after ya monnies.
did she not say JS assaulted her live on Top of The Pops ?

In another e-mail to Mr Williams-Thomas, on 22 November, Mr Jones offered some candid observations about the ex Duncroft residents. He said that while ‘most’ were intelligent, ‘most’ were also ‘emotionally damaged’ with a ‘criminal background’ as well as being ‘suspicious... extremely manipulative [and] difficult to deal with’.103 In his evidence Mr Jones rather played down this description of the residents.
downloads.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/file...w/pollard_review.pdf


Would it be rude to ask what kind of criminal background they had and why journalists considered them reliable?