Please read the Sunday Telegraph report that Attorney General is coming under increasing pressure to stand aside.

At present it is he - a close "pal" of Tony Blair - who will decide whether Blair should face charges of "cash for honours".

The same Attorney General who helped his pal by declaring that the war in Iraq was legal (at a time when the armed forces were highly dubious and looked likely to refuse to take part) - but refuses to tell anyone else how he came to that conclusion.

It's all a bit like asking one Kray twin whether the other should be charged !!!!!!

Cash for honours doesn't much bother me... The history of buying honours, either by cash or 'favours', is so old as to be not worth taking umbrage at.

The venality of taking the War in Iraq as 'legal' however should have resulted in both their heads being displayed on Westminster Bridge. There again, the decaying pates of the previous Prime Ministers should also be displayed for their role in the sales of the Utilities...