for sex with 14 year olds but hey, she's a woman and they were boys - not serious!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4537198...o-schoolboys-14.html

Deviates quite significantly from the sentencing guidelines, especially with alcohol and drugs as aggravating factors.

Rolf got twice as long for momentary groping. JK got three times as long, again for tales of non-penetrative fondling.

Rolf was convicted of false allegations of groping.

Wasn't there a story during the week about a Judge who said that he "refuses to jail women" and let a woman off with a serious conviction with a straight forward community sentence?

The reason for the 2-1/2 years is that = 30 months get below that its 10 years on the register, she now has to sign and have home visits for possibly the next 40+ years, that is a huge burden on tax payers

Another point, about evidence.

After being arrested, Tillyer initially denied carrying out any abuse and claimed she had been raped by the boys.

So how did the police determine that the woman's claim of rape was not true? Aren't they supposed to believe anyone who makes a sexual allegation? Especially a vulnerable victim like this who apparently suffers from anxiety and a personality disorder

steveimp wrote:
Wasn't there a story during the week about a Judge who said that he "refuses to jail women" and let a woman off with a serious conviction with a straight forward community sentence?

The girl who stabbed her boyfriend in the leg? Yes, I think you're right.

This is because, in a Marxist criminological system, your culpability has nothing to do with what you've done. It's mainly to do with who you are. If you're a member of a favoured victim class, such as women or "refugees" you can behave as badly as you like. An excuse will always be found for you, simultaneously shifting the blame onto a less-favoured class which oppresses and made you do it somehow.

Jo wrote:
Rolf was convicted of false allegations of groping.

How do you know that they were false allegations of groping. Were you there at the time?

I recommend you read through the analysis of Rolf's first prosecution here www.rolfharrisisinnocent.com

It is pretty straightforward, fact-based, logical stuff and that's how we know they were false allegations.