cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Spacey latest
#168707
Peter

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
If ITK had his naive and vindictive way, we would all forced to be virgins by the time we reach 80.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168711
hedda

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
PaulB wrote:
While on the subject, having veered away from Mr Spacey, the youngest British couple which I know of were Richard of Shrewsbury and Ann Mowbray, married in 1478. He was 4 and she was 5.
It was a political marriage, and it's doubtful that they had sex. He was widowed 3 years later.

Meanwhile, back on to the subject of Kevin Spacey. If he is cleared of wrong doing, I wonder how many millions he will be able to claim from Ridley Scott. There's bound to be a lawyer, chomping at the bit and shaving pencils somewhere off screen, waiting.


Of course situations like that are very similar to some Muslim customs which some ignorant hysterics have zilch knowledge of what is actually happening..an arranged marriage for either political or economic reasons and sex is almost forgotten.

Many men will "marry" a underage (to us) bride but sex only happens when they are of legal age. It's a custom dating back a 1000 years.

## of course some terrible things will happen but a 4 & 5 year old?..too interested in playing dolls and trains. They did have trains didn't they.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168721
In The Know

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
hedda wrote:

Many men will "marry" a underage (to us) bride but sex only happens when they are of legal age. It's a custom dating back a 1000 years.


Oh, God ! More common sense from hedda ! (whisky and soda please)

The others are still on about marriage - this was NOT a marriage - it was a grown man trying to bum a boy !!!!!
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168724
Randall

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
hedda wrote:


## of course some terrible things will happen but a 4 & 5 year old?..too interested in playing dolls and trains. They did have trains didn't they.


Probably not in 1478, dear.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168726
Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
Randall wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:

Whatever the stupid law says, a ten year old cant give consent.


...in your opinion. Some cultures and jurisdictions (not many, admittedly) think otherwise. Remember that there are many in the world who would say that an under 18 year-old could never give sexual consent. They are aghast at institutionalised paedophilia in nations like Great Britain where one can have sex with 16 and 17 year olds.

I don't have a view on which culture or set of laws is right or wrong: I can only say how well it accords with my own preferences and ethical ideas. But I do think societies are allowed to organise themselves as they see fit, and not according to what you or ITK or any other outsider prefers.



Different countries have different laws, traditions and needs, but ten year olds are the same all over the world. IN MY OPINION.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168735
In The Know

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
but ten year olds are the same all over the world. IN MY OPINION.

... and ALL need protecting from predators.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168738
hedda

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
Randall wrote:
hedda wrote:


## of course some terrible things will happen but a 4 & 5 year old?..too interested in playing dolls and trains. They did have trains didn't they.


Probably not in 1478, dear.


prove they didn't
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#168751
Randall

Re:Spacey latest 6 Years, 5 Months ago  
hedda wrote:
Randall wrote:
hedda wrote:


## of course some terrible things will happen but a 4 & 5 year old?..too interested in playing dolls and trains. They did have trains didn't they.


Probably not in 1478, dear.


prove they didn't


By inspection.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply