What I find frightening is that this detail, carried in a tiny local paper, is totally absent from major media reports. Also how such a stunning conclusion can not affect the other verdicts in the trial. How can such a total failure to disclose such vital information not contaminate the entire prosecution case? Really, it is time independent investigators examined police, CPS and judicial behaviour.
www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/regional/rolf-...overturned-1-8247747
As you see (above) it was not a failure to disclose (almost always a serious matter) but a failure to discover that has cancelled that conviction.
For some reason the necessary checks had not been made, or had not properly been made, at the time of the trial, said the judge. The relevant information was available to be found and disclosed, but that did not happen: "In our judgment this was a significant failing."