cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Enter what you see:
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage Tip: Reload page if you have difficulty reading characters
Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: Danny Kay case.
#170905
Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 3 Days ago Karma: 3
He was made to see a psychiatrist because he was "in denial" about raping someone.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5223567...-police-blunder.html

First they deliberately jail innocent people, Then refuse their parole and give them unnecessary treatment if they dont go along with the lie.
It is no wonder so many innocent people plead guilty, is it?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#170917
andrew

Re:Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 2 Days ago  
Will she go to prison or an asylum ?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#170925
Re:Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 2 Days ago Karma: 3
andrew wrote:
Will she go to prison or an asylum ?

Probably neither. Remember that woman who did it (I think?) seven times?
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#170933
'M'

Re:Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 2 Days ago  
Nothing will happen to her like many others they get away with it along with the police who should BELIEVE no one and find the truth.
Many will refer to her for years to come as "the victim" the madness will continue.

He should name her now although the courts will still be protecting her.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#170934
Re:Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 2 Days ago Karma: 51
And as I've often said I don't blame her (neither does he); I blame the police and the CPS; less obvious but far more evil is encouraging such deceit and failing to stop it.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#171010
Randall

Re:Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 1 Day ago  
Actually JK, I think we can point the finger at the accuser in this case. When asked by the police to provide Facebook messages between her and her victim, she supplied a falsified message log, deliberately (and quite cleverly, I'll give her that) edited to make the guy look guilty. There's probably enough there for a perverting the course of justice prosecution.

Also,

...a witness statement from the officer leading the investigation, saying the messages were obtained by asking the accuser to log in to Facebook and print them off. ‘I made sure that no messages were missed.’

Oh really PC Plod? I'd like to hear all about how he made sure no messages were missed. Best case scenario is either that he's plain lazy or he's utterly incompetent at investigations. Should be dismissed in either case. If he's knowingly made that statement falsely, that's a more serious -and criminal - kettle of fish.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#171040
holocaust21

Re:Danny Kay case. 3 Weeks, 1 Day ago  
WTF how was a message log supplied by her even allowed in court? In a 'normal' legal system my understanding is that first evidence must be shown to the judge and there may be some argument between the defence and prosecution over whether the evidence can be shown to the jury, in which case the judge would decide. So evidence like this, where it can easily be made up, would be banned from being shown to the jury.

Of course I'm not a lawyer so who knows, but if what I suggested ever did exist I assume some feminist rape law abolished it all in favor of finding innocent men guilty of rape.

Also it's all very well blaming the police and the CPS - and they are utter scum - but our supposedly totally objective court system should then be able to show that either the evidence is doubtful (thus NOT GUILTY) or the evidence is blatantly fake (thus NOT GUILTY) but our courts don't. Both because they fail to scrutinise evidence shown by the victim properly and because even if it's just her word for it they take that as evidence! A suspected liars word is not evidence! FFS
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply