With the current hysteria over the 'All The Money In The World" movie and the fact that Mark Whalberg got paid a fortune and someone else peanuts (both negotiated by their agents) accompanied by the #MeToo campaign and the attacks upon the BBC over so-called "equal pay" etc etc : an answer is needed to an important question about The Yartz:

will it be demanded that a Vincent van Gogh masterpiece be priced equally to an emerging or unknown artist?

If not why not and how do you judge artistic merit (that generally governs price) when it's all subjective in the "I know what I like" sense?

#answers on a postcard with the usual fiver thanks (No more IOUs from ITK either)