He simply cannot resist Tweeting - his first in 20 days... Mr King @KingOfHits have spent my whole career investigating,exposing & helping authorities bring to justice offenders like u. I will continue doing what I do, even if u, & minority of others with agendas attack/abuse me. Just remember ‘You are a convicted child sex offender.’

I am a WRONGLY convicted sex offender (not child; a child is, according to the 1933 act - never reformed - a person under 14) and I'm sure you will continue helping authorities bring to justice other targets like Cliff, Gambo and your other victims, Mark, if they and the media continues to support you. Meanwhile my appeal goes forward, hugely assisted, thank you, by fresh evidence, much concerning Mark Williams Thomas. Since you are back on social media, Mark, could you give us the correct facts about your rumoured extra marital affairs?

I see Mark has resorted to the old faithful of 'everyone who disagrees has an agenda against me' routine.

When that doesn't work then it will be the 'Anyone who questions me must be a child Abuse supporter!'

You have obviously touched a large nerve JK for him to react in this way.

Keep going sir, hopefully your total acquittal on all charges will be finalised soon.

I'm surprised he hasn't blocked you, JK, or maybe he has? He sounds as if he's cornered. Not sure if I believe the rumours of affairs, though. Would someone who points up his morality ("I think my moral compass is high. I think my values are high" source) be so immoral? On the other hand, publishing Rolf Harris's name in the way he did (#Savile: hint hint, #sexual offences: hint hint hint) months before he was arrested or charged doesn't seem very moral to me, especially given Lord Leveson's report published on the very day of the tweet (coincidence?) deprecating just that kind of thing (as if anyone with a high moral compass would need that spelled out), though I'm sure Mark would consider that the ends justified the means, as Rolf is now a "convicted child sex offender". Hooray! Result!

He says he's spent "his whole career" - so the chewing gum episode was a lie? His trial for blackmail never took place? He never sold victim contact details to the papers? He had nothing to do with the Cliff Richard fiasco? And as for his less than gleaming TV career... he seems to not know about a great deal in his "whole career". I wonder if he knows it's over and he's toast?

After 15 days the best he can do is this?
The man is in bits has no where to go.
JK well done you really have touched a nerve.

The affairs thing is bollocks he does not have the bullocks to do it but he will have something that floats his boat gives him that twinge mainly Sabrina The Teenage Witch does it.

And in his cause of standing up for victims look what he has put Sammy Sam through with his Investigator series 1 using Sam for his financial and TV fame only to completely dump (Sammy Sam) after all the promise of support, this is the man that will continue to do what he does.
Marks only defence is offence, he hold the keys to his evidence to prove he is genuine and only needs to put it out there I'm sure he has the headed note paper to print it on.

Nobody here wants offenders to get away with crimes but to create or embellish evidence / statements on fairly easy targets is eventually going to catch up.
The investigator 1 I watched and the conclusion of four episodes gave nothing more than was on the table at the beginning other than putting a woman through he'll in the name of self promotion.

If I state here 'Mark has some very dark demons' would you belive me ? Is it true? It's not much to put a little story together and before long it's fact and that is what he does we do not know the truth / facts so only judge by what we hear or read so it's easy to claim guilt based on hearsay neXT thing you are being convicted while real offenders get missed for the greater story.
Mark is angry now,steaming after loosing the last few weeks battle to the evidence stacking up against him and if I hear correctly no more morning sofa jobs.

Will he still go ahead with his "talk" on Monday? Will anyone attend? Will he admit his past transgressions? I suspect there may be questions. Poor man. Karma again.

Looks to be still on JK and tix still available.

JK2006 wrote:
He says he's spent "his whole career" - so the chewing gum episode was a lie? His trial for blackmail never took place? He never sold victim contact details to the papers? He had nothing to do with the Cliff Richard fiasco? And as for his less than gleaming TV career... he seems to not know about a great deal in his "whole career". I wonder if he knows it's over and he's toast?

Oh but he's been at it since he was 14 !!

Must have been because he says in his Mirror article about shocking child prostitution in Brazil during the World Cup (Google it)..not that he did anything about it just flew in and out and possibly alerted any offenders ...that he had "30 years experience investigating child sex abuse"..he was 44 at the time according to his Wikipedia entry (which he edits).

Maybe the Chewing Gum removal business was a cover.

but really.. what a f*cking dickhead ! Does he really truly think that someone like JK after hearing what the Judge said about Williams-Thomas would sit still and ignore his shocking attempts at manipulating the law?

I bet there are plenty more people who are after MWT's blood (metaphorically or course )

I wonder if he goes after he comes. I hear someone once asked him if he smoked after sex and he replied he did not know because he did not look.

Anyone know whether, if someone posts a comment in your Twitter feed or on your Facebook page, you can delete it if you don't want it there?

From MWT's Twitter page:

"What a sicko he should have been suffocated at birth" (posted on 23 November)
twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/1065915937977712640?p=v

And from his Facebook page:

"Kitty is guilty without any doubt in my mind" (posted two weeks ago)
facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=108170...amp;focus_composer=0

It looks like his tweet to you and his response to the M.O.S have disappeared from his Twitter timeline.

Well I can't find it anyway.

I can't see them either, i.e. his tweet to JK and response to the MoS article. His response to the MoS story also seems to have disappeared from his website.

He is really, really frightened of something.

JK2006 wrote:
He is really, really frightened of something.

Well yes, He would be. What if he is on trial and a policeman "forgets" to hand in vital information?

The truth JK

I was wrong about it not being on MWT's website. It's no longer shown on the homepage but is still on the site, as linked to on his Facebook page under this post of 9 November:

As a result of the article in the Mail on Sunday I have now been subject to a lot of abuse , including threats of violence and death . I have therefore been advised to publish a detailed analysis of the inaccurate personal attack by Rose and Waterhouse .

My work over the years , both in the police, and since as an investigative reporter has been to give victims a voice and hold offenders to account . In doing so I make huge personal sacrifices , very often undertaking a considerable amount of work for free , because I genuinely care for the people I work with and as such I will always go far beyond what is expected.

This is sadly not the first time that I have received threats , which has included in the past being sent child abuse material and even an incendiary device .

Click on this link for the full analysis:
www.williams-thomas.co.uk/response-to-da...e-waterhouse-article

He was sent a book of matches

Jo wrote:
Anyone know whether, if someone posts a comment in your Twitter feed or on your Facebook page, you can delete it if you don't want it there?

From MWT's Twitter page:

"What a sicko he should have been suffocated at birth" (posted on 23 November)
twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/1065915937977712640?p=v

And from his Facebook page:

"Kitty is guilty without any doubt in my mind" (posted two weeks ago)
facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=108170...amp;focus_composer=0

wonder what the legality is in a case like that?

The Heath copper Mike Veale allowed comments and photos of those kids in the Hampstead baby eating case to remain for a long time before he deleted the entire comment.